George Bush was right ton invade Iraq for many reasons. Saddam Hussein had cancelled numerous planned weapons inspections by the United Nations installing fear in the USA that he had them. Saddam Hussein was a brutal dictator who massacred nearly a million of his own citizens. He told his country he was a direct descendant of Mohammed. Saddam Hussein was a crazy and brutal dictator.

He gassed and bombed his own people in the Kurds. Killing hundreds of thousands of them. During the Iran-Iraq war between 1980-88 Saddam used brutal measures which were against the Geneva convention. He tortured opposing soldiers and he even tortured the Iraqi national soccer team when they were not achieving desired results.

George Bush's decision to invade Iraq in 2003 to topple the regime was the correct one even though they did not have any weapons of mass destruction. George Bush ousted a brutal dictator who was massacring his people and he was crazy.

To all the peace activists out there who were against the war i am not sure where you are coming from. You stand for peace yet you wanted no war and a brutal dictator to stay in power. Killing hundreds and thousand of his own civillians in the process. Although there were no weapons of mass destruction the war was a success as it got rid of Hitler's cousin in Saddam Hussein. Saving thousand of Iraqi's. Yes there plan for post war and to evacuate the reason has been very bad. That can be demonstrated against and seen as not successful as the US has had no clear exit strategy. Although one must commend the spirit of George Bush to get rid of the appalling human in Saddam Hussein and liberate the people of Iraq. The next step is implementing a successful evacuation plan immediately. Although the initial war was fought on the right grounds. George Bush was looking after his fellow humans experiencing the rein of tyranny under Saddam.